Moro,
Onko raatilla kokemusta Nikonille sopivista teleoptiikoista/polttoväleistä +150mm jotka käyttäytyisivät vastavaloon/tai sivuvastavaloon siedettävästi. Jotain mikä toimisi paremmin kuin käytössä oleva 70-200VR2, millä näyttää ainakin olevan toivotonta. Flaretonta linssiä ei kait ole olemassakaan, mutta haen jotain samansuuntaista parannusta kuin Nikkor 14-24 ja 16-35 vs. Tamron 15-35.
https://imgur.com/a/wYJpexp
Miten Tamron 70-200 tai 100-400 ? Nikon 300?
t;Mika
Flare-resistant teleoptiikka
-
- Viestit: 2529
- Liittynyt: Maalis 01, 2009 21 : 16
- Paikkakunta: Suur-Sawo
Re: Flare-resistant teleoptiikka
mitä olen katsellut lenstipin testejä niin ei ole tullut vastaan montaa linssiä jota olisi kehuttu hyväksi vastavalonsiedon kanssa. pistetäänpäs vähän yhteenvetoa erilaisista teleoptiikoista:
irix 150mm macro: "weak performance against bright light"
sigma 180mm os macro: "work against bright light could have been better"
sigma 150mm os macro: "average work against bright light"
canon 200mm f/2 is: "work against bright light should have been better"
canon 300mm f/4 is: "average work against bright light"
canon 200mm f/2.8: "work against bright light could have been better"
nikon 300mm f/4 pf: "average performance against bright light"
tamron 70-210mm f/4 vc: "too weak performance against bright light"
tamron 100-400mm vc: "a bit too many flares and too noticeable loss of contrast while working against bright light"
sigma c 100-400mm os: "a bit too many flares and losses of contrast during the work against bright light"
nikon 70-200mm f/4 vr: "work against bright light could have been better"
tokina 70-200mm f/4: "disastrous performance against bright light"
tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 vc: "work against bright light should have been better"
sigman 135mm f/1.8 ja 135mm apo-sonnar eivät saaneet haukkuja(!) ja nikonin vr 200mm f/2:ta jopa kehuttiin ("good work against bright light")!
irix 150mm macro: "weak performance against bright light"
sigma 180mm os macro: "work against bright light could have been better"
sigma 150mm os macro: "average work against bright light"
canon 200mm f/2 is: "work against bright light should have been better"
canon 300mm f/4 is: "average work against bright light"
canon 200mm f/2.8: "work against bright light could have been better"
nikon 300mm f/4 pf: "average performance against bright light"
tamron 70-210mm f/4 vc: "too weak performance against bright light"
tamron 100-400mm vc: "a bit too many flares and too noticeable loss of contrast while working against bright light"
sigma c 100-400mm os: "a bit too many flares and losses of contrast during the work against bright light"
nikon 70-200mm f/4 vr: "work against bright light could have been better"
tokina 70-200mm f/4: "disastrous performance against bright light"
tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 vc: "work against bright light should have been better"
sigman 135mm f/1.8 ja 135mm apo-sonnar eivät saaneet haukkuja(!) ja nikonin vr 200mm f/2:ta jopa kehuttiin ("good work against bright light")!
Gold member of Sigma 14mm f/1.8 & 100-300mm f/4 fun club.