Fujifilm GFX 50S vs Pentax 645Z vs Hasselblad X1D

[aikaarska]

Dpreviewllä oli tälläinen katsaus tänään:

Fujifilm GFX 50S vs Pentax 645Z vs Hasselblad X1D

https://www.dpreview.com/articles/93729 ... elblad-x1d" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Jos ei jaksa plärätä koko hommaa läpi, niin tässä jonkinlainen lopputulema:

Conclusion


Overall, there's little to choose between these cameras in terms of image quality. This should be no great surprise, given they're likely to be using sensors with similar underpinnings (even if we know some of the specifics of microlenses and ISO behavior differ).

However, that isn't to say there's nothing to choose between them. The Pentax 645Z is the immediate choice for anyone who wants an optical viewfinder. It also exists as part of a longer-established system (though some of the lenses significantly pre-date the demands of high-res digital).

Somewhat perversely, for all its compactness, the Hasselblad X1D's high sync speeds and limited battery life mean it's more comfortable in the studio whereas, despite its greater bulk, the Fujifilm's faster focus and greater endurance makes it more tempting for shooting in further flung locations.

Some of these strengths and weaknesses aren't set in stone: leaf shutter lenses for the Fujifilm would greatly extend its capability, as would updated firmware for the X1D (especially if it could result in faster and easier to position autofocus).

Overall, of course, these are exotic pieces of kit. Expensive and, despite the mass-market roots of the Pentax and Fujifilm's interfaces, still more complex to shoot with than the full frame cameras that are probably the more sensible choice for most mortals, given the price, image quality and performance offered. That said, there's something special about shooting with such daunting machines, and something that's likely to immediately impress most would-be clients.